Henry Ford revolutionized manufacturing with his invention of the assembly line. Before 1913, Ford and virtually every other automaker assembled whole cars at a station, with a team of workers completing a single example, usually from start to finish.
Ford had been trying to increase his factories’ productivity for making the Model T to meet his ideal of building his “motor car for the great multitude.” The first Model T cost $850, which is $21,000 in today’s dollars. But he felt this wasn’t cheap enough for the masses and looked for ways to reduce costs while boosting production rates.
Ford broke the Model T assembly down into 84 discrete steps and trained workers to do just one of them. He also built machines that would stamp out automobile parts automatically, much more quickly than humans could. For his assembly line, Ford installed moving lines to handle various parts. In December 1913, he unveiled the moving chassis assembly line. Several months later, a mechanized belt that traveled at six feet per minute was added, allowing Ford to produce more cars much faster. The assembly line cut the amount of time it took to assemble a Model T from 12.5 hours to just 93 minutes.
Not only did Ford achieve a 90 percent productivity gain with his assembly line implementation, but he also saved a considerable amount on operating costs. Ford doubled wages to $5/hour and cut working hours from ten to eight hours a day. By drastically reducing production costs through standardized parts and more efficient assembly, Ford was able to bring the cost of the automobile down to $260, low enough for everyone to purchase.
Today’s automotive manufacturing lines have changed significantly with the addition of robots, interchangeable parts, and hydraulic lifts. The Ford assembly plant in Michigan that produced the first Model T went from 100 cars per day in 1913 to 1,000 vehicles per day a year later. Today the same assembly plant builds over 600 Ford Focus and C-Max sedans in each of two 10-hour shifts using just 500 people. The current line’s flexibility allows for the creation of five different models with a range of colors and features. One hundred and twelve years after Ford’s first moving assembly line launched, the company now makes 16 Ford vehicles every minute.
Automobiles are no longer made from start to finish in the same place. Parts are created all around the world and then assembled in multiple facilities until the final car is pieced together at still another location.
Take, for example, Adient LLC’s facility in Georgia, which assembles seats, door panels, and other interior parts for several automobiles. The high-volume facility completes 55 jobs per hour, so every minute counts in assembly and every inch of workspace is essential.
Automotive assembly plants have found that U-shaped cells work best for saving space and because there are so many intricate subassembly processes involved in vehicle assembly. For example, assembling an engine block or dashboard in one of these cells allows a highly specified process to take place without crowding or consuming space on the main assembly line.
Implementing one-piece flow with U-shaped assembly cells is a great way to save space in most manufacturing environments with moderate variability in production volume and product mix. One-piece flow will have a tremendous impact on manufacturing lead times, production delays, inventory levels, and warehousing space requirements.
Some of the key concepts to understand when transitioning to a manufacturing cell are:
One-piece flow, the opposite of batch processing, is the movement of a single product through the manufacturing process. One-piece flow redirects the workforce away from non-value-added activities, such as searching for parts, and focuses on the manufacturing process. With batch processing, large amounts of waste occur during the waiting, transportation, and storage of inventory. Workers maximize their output at the expense of downstream processes and increased work-in-process.
Right-sizing machinery to meet customer demand, rather than minimizing part costs, is essential to the success of cellular manufacturing. Placing smaller, slower equipment in close proximity to other equipment and processes helps eliminate wasted space, walking, and inventory buildup while lowering initial costs. Cellular manufacturing is a system for transferring products between stations (i.e., U-, J-, or L-shaped assembly cells), a method for feeding parts into the stations (flow racks, bins, or carts), and a means of flowing finished goods and packaging out of the system.
Implementing cellular manufacturing in the appropriate environments can positively impact a business. Reconfiguring machinery into assembly cells reduces material handling and warehouse footprint. When properly executed, a company will simultaneously shorten its lead times and dramatically reduce work-in-process inventory. Having a cross-trained workforce gives a factory greater flexibility to meet variations in demand and a better understanding of quality.
Manufacturing has come a very long way since Henry Ford’s Model T came in black, black or black. Today, there are dozens of options for nearly every product imaginable, which is outstanding for consumers but can pose logistical challenges during assembly. Because there are so many different options, stock rotation is paramount in most operations in the automotive assembly plant. FIFO is a natural fit for assembly processes that require stock rotation because it is backloaded and follows a logical order. The first product loaded is also the first product picked. If you’ve analyzed your throughput, stocking using FIFO becomes a smooth, hassle-free storage method.
Lineside storage has been complicated by the deluge of choices consumers have today. During the early Ford years, it was easy to keep pallets of black door panels along the line, because there was no variety. However, when 40 different colors are available (do you want your door black, midnight, or gunmetal black?), storage becomes much more difficult. To keep palletized storage within reach, the assembly line must be extended to accommodate this additional space. Additional physical space to extend the line means more equipment and more pickers. Replacing those pallets with a lineside flow rack system is much more efficient. Flow racks, like FlowCell, are used for just-in-time storage, where assemblers each pick items for assembly.
At Adient LLC's plant, lineside assembly racks are used to hold parts such as door handles, airbags, and brackets/buttons. As a just-in-time operation, the plant needs to keep things moving without interruption. Lineside FlowCells can easily be configured to handle a variety of parts, keeping productivity high. These racks have greatly improved the efficiency of the assembly process.
Maintaining a consistent flow of materials lineside requires balancing the right parts in the right locations so they can be picked and placed quickly and easily within the assembly cells. Combining flow and assembly cell techniques is becoming increasingly popular in automotive manufacturing, providing greater flexibility and reducing time and workspace requirements. What would Henry Ford say now if he saw a modern assembly plant with employees working on bits and pieces instead of the entire automobile? He’d probably like it.
UNEX specializes in engineered smart space-saving solutions for Assembly Operations, serving several industries, including distribution, logistics, retail, and manufacturing. Learn how UNEX can help maintain high productivity, improve ergonomics, and maximize storage space in your operation. Click here to contact us.